They didn't even try to come up with an excuse about it. And when they were caught, they didn't say anything about it. The other thing they did is they put a checkmark on something to make it look like it was a validated account when it wasn't. And I believe your question says, "Well, it's only a Twitter check and changing a year of a date here." They switched the date of a Twitter a year to try to connect it to this case. What I'm telling you is that they doctored evidence.
#Youtube sl1pg8r scorched earth tv
You guys have to stop and start reporting more like PBS does rather than a TV news show that doesn't have any journalistic integrity at all. I watch another station at the same time and it's sunny.
When I watch the news, I watch one station and it's raining.
And the media should be looking that at a square, straight way, a straight way. It's unconscionable, aside from all of the due process violations that my client had. Van der Veen continued: What should happen is somebody should look at the conduct of these House managers. That is when the interview went completely off the rails.Īfter Zak seemingly minimized the actions of Democratic House impeachment managers, van der Veen tore into the media. The "doctored evidence" that van der Veen referred to included edited tweets and selectively edited video. They need to look at who these House managers were and look to see whether these are the folks they want representing them. The American people should not be putting up with this. It was absolutely shocking, I think, when we discovered it and we were able to expose it and put it out. And when they had to come to the court of the Senate to put their case on, because they hadn't done any investigation, they doctored evidence. The prosecutors in this case doctored evidence.
#Youtube sl1pg8r scorched earth trial
But what happened at the Capitol during this trial was not too far away from that. What happened at the Capitol on January 6 is absolutely horrific. Van der Veen said: I used the word "insurrection" in my closing argument when quoting the charging documents. Van der Veen responded by dismissing the question as "political rhetoric," and then corrected Zak - and pointed out that Democratic House impeachment managers "doctored evidence" against Trump. What happened?ĬBS News host Lana Zak began the interview by asking van der Veen whether he believes Trump will face more charges beyond impeachment, and accused the attorney of admitting that Trump incited an "insurrection."
Michael van der Veen, one of former President Donald Trump's defense attorneys, tore into the mainstream media and Democratic House impeachment managers in an explosive interview on Saturday that ended with the attorney ripping off his microphone and walking away.
0 kommentar(er)
